This Xian apologist calls himself a prophet (modest, eh?). His arguments are pretty lame. . .for example (the Xian is "Nick"):
How silly is that? He is trying to make counter missionaries look like fools! Jsus can't be the messiah because he WAS NOT a MESSIAH-- per the Greek text itself Jsus (if he ever lived) was never an anointed king or priest. So this person's version of a counter missionary argument avoids the real answer completely and puts up a stupid sounding "because I said so" comment that a child might make.Nick: But passages XYZ speak of the Messiah and were directly fulfilled by Jsus.
Zvi: Passages XYZ cannot be speaking of Jsus because Jsus is not the Messiah.
The rest is more of the same (the tired old Genesis 18 nonsense (to support the idea of the trinity) Link, Insisting the elohim is plural We've discussed this ad naseum -- it just comes from a lack of Hebrew grammar knowledge. It also overlooks clear statements in the Torah that G-is is ONE.
No doubt this all sounds impressive to people who don't know better, but it is all nonsense. Not surprising given his bio in in his FAQ:
Need I say more?Did you go to Bible College?
Truthfully, I haven't even attended secular university. I'm a high school drop out with a GED who just likes to read a lot.










