Dougg,
I thank you for your response.

You claim that "everlasting righteousnes" comes later at the end of days. I already wrote that if this is true, we are not dealing with a fulfillement that missionaries can point to- rather we are being asked to believe that something will happen which has not happened yet. That is OK, but we are leaving the category of evidence that Messiah son of David came during the Second Temple.

The proof that there are 2 anointed ones is not limited to the two mentions of "anointed": it is also the 2 distinct times periods of 62 and 7. I explained why Brown has no good explanation for this.

You ask a good question about whether Cyrus was anointed according to Jewish law. In this case a double standard is justified: 1. Jesus is Jewish and Cyrus is not
2. Jesus is claimed to be Messiah son of David, therefore he must be anointed the way Jewish kings are anointed.