Medini:
the foundational difference here is NOT in a recognition of the need for atonement, BUT in the WAYS in which that need is satisfied


Okay, would it be accurate to say that you believe you have atonement without blood?



SearchinMyRoots:
You do have to admit, the xtian philosphy does "change" things in our bible a bit, doesn't it?


You do realize - that's exactly what we're debating, right?
Anyway, to answer your question, I say - not in the slightest (Matt 5:18).



MalachiII:
As always not one Trinitarian even stopped to answer my question


If you're referring to this post, I didn't see a question. Is there a question you'd like to ask?

But I did notice that you did not answer Rebecca's very relevant question:
Quote:
"Malachi, what is your background, if you don't mind. I seem to remember you are or were a Jehovah's witness?"
Would you care to answer? While you're at it, would you care to explain how you believe we obtain forgiveness from our sins today?

Peace :)