Mark,
Thank you for your reply, although I kind of knew the answer you were going to provide.

Well we don't see "eye to eye" on whether or not you think things were "changed" by the nt or not. As Sophiee points out, we (the Jewish people) are to obey G-d's commandments. Leviticus states we should obstain from eating shellfish.

On the other hand, I noticed you quoted the nt in both cases. The problem arises in that "sexual immorality" is also strongly stated in Leviticus. So this is not "new" to us. It was said thousands of years prior to Paul's writings.

This is where the difference lies. It seems as if the nt uses some of the commandments, but dismisses others. How can that be? Don't you see wherein the objection lies? You can't have your cake and eat it too. Either you believe G-d's word as it was written, or you don't. You cannot use the commandments that "are moral" and not use the "ones you don't understand there value".

Read Psalms 119 over and over again. Why do you think it is the longest Psalm? Why would King David take the time to write over and over again about how beautiful ALL of G-d's commandments are and how they bring life? Why he started to write it in Psalm 19, then must have realized how important it is, and probably figured he didn't stress it enough. So therefore he wrote the longest Pslam in the Book of Writings, Psalm 119. Why would he do that?

Should the Jewish people just ignore it because Paul wrote something different many years later?