ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Search this Topic:
Forum Jump
Posts: 0
Tue, 20-Nov-07 16:50:35
Quote:Medini:No act, no role, done or assumed by G-d, can be G-d unless it is a role or act not freely done or assumed by G-d - i.e., an inherent or essential act or role. If it is free, then it is ex-nihilo and, it that most basic existential dependence, cannot be G-d. If it is not free, then your "G-d" is finite in "His" essential dependence, and not G-d at all.
Quote:MediniAlso, I would like to comment on your "one Name worthy of worship" - First, you gave three distinct names with different meanings, not "one Name"; Second, NO "name" or anything else finite is "worthy of worship". G-d's Names (even His Sublime Name YKVK) are to open us to the truly worthy of worship; no Name is to become the object of worship - that is idolatry, plain and simple.
Share This