Quote:
Medini:
No act, no role, done or assumed by G-d, can be G-d unless it is a role or act not freely done or assumed by G-d - i.e., an inherent or essential act or role. If it is free, then it is ex-nihilo and, it that most basic existential dependence, cannot be G-d. If it is not free, then your "G-d" is finite in "His" essential dependence, and not G-d at all.


I'm not sure I understand what you mean.
Man speaks words and he breathes, as an image of God. God also spoke His Word and Breathed. What God did was before or beyond all times. His Word is generated by the Father out of Love; His Word is free, but bound by Love. Because God, who is Love,can only Speak=generate Love.

Quote:
Medini
Also, I would like to comment on your "one Name worthy of worship" - First, you gave three distinct names with different meanings, not "one Name"; Second, NO "name" or anything else finite is "worthy of worship". G-d's Names (even His Sublime Name YKVK) are to open us to the truly worthy of worship; no Name is to become the object of worship - that is idolatry, plain and simple.


I agree with that:
"The Tao that can be expressed is not the eternal Tao
The name that can be defined is not the unchanging name."

first lines of the Tao Te Ching or The Daodejing, Laozi (?), 300 BCE (?)
:)
Aad