Quote:
Medini:
What I mean is that these acts of speaking or breathing can either be entirely free to G-d (unlike man where breathing, for example, is involuntary) or they can be inherent. If entirely free, then they are acts that exist from non-existence, whether eternally or in time, and they cannot be G-d unless you have a G-d who exists from non-existence, an existential limitation hardly applicable to the Truly Infinite. But if inherent, if not entirely voluntary, then they are acts that G-d MUST do from His very nature, an essential limitation also hardly applicable to the Truly Infinite. Thus, either neither of these acts are G-d in any sense, thereby negating the Trinity, or your G-d is existentially or essentially limited to the degree that your G-d cannot be Truly Infinite, and in that dependence simply cannot be legitimately said to be G-d at all.


Wow. Let me summarize in poetry of some kind:

Light from light,
cannot be truly light
because it came from light
which proves its dependence of light
the dependence makes light a lesser light
therefore not truly light.

Is that so?
I think no.

Your reasoning, imv, does not apply to light or God.

One Being, three divine 'operators' or persons. It is not One Being generating another Being, who bring forth a third Being: three gods. It still is One Being, generating His divine Word, and bringing forth His divine Spirit.

Aad:)