ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Search this Topic:
Forum Jump
Posts: 0
Wed, 21-Nov-07 17:11:33
Quote:Medini:What I mean is that these acts of speaking or breathing can either be entirely free to G-d (unlike man where breathing, for example, is involuntary) or they can be inherent. If entirely free, then they are acts that exist from non-existence, whether eternally or in time, and they cannot be G-d unless you have a G-d who exists from non-existence, an existential limitation hardly applicable to the Truly Infinite. But if inherent, if not entirely voluntary, then they are acts that G-d MUST do from His very nature, an essential limitation also hardly applicable to the Truly Infinite. Thus, either neither of these acts are G-d in any sense, thereby negating the Trinity, or your G-d is existentially or essentially limited to the degree that your G-d cannot be Truly Infinite, and in that dependence simply cannot be legitimately said to be G-d at all.
Share This