EzAad:
Light from light,
cannot be truly light
because it came from light
which proves its dependence of light
the dependence makes light a lesser light
therefore not truly light.

Is that so?
I think no.

Medini:
Light is a created subtance and is finite, NOT Absolutely Infinite. Nor is it an activity like speaking or breathing - that is the "from", "came from" here. So, your poem has just presented us with a fallacy of false analogy.

What is more, the issue is inherent versus voluntative activity in the "from", "came from" here. Which is it? Either the activity is NOT G-d or your "G-d" is not G-d - those are your ONLY logical choices.

SMR:
Problem is..... G-d is not a "being" at all. He is infinite.

Medini:
Exactly.