I don't think Aad can see the difference between one and three.

Early on in this discussion Aad tried to separate the word of the Lord from the the breath of His mouth by quoting Psalm 33:6. He was challenged concerning his understanding of Hebrew poetry. His reply was:
Quote:
2Sam.23:2. The spirit of the Lord spoke in me, And His word was upon my tongue.

Is this also poetry? I think not.

I dont recall a response from him concerning his false assumption, (quoted above) which showed his complete lack of understanding of Hebrew thought. Not even to recognize he was in error in his bold statement, but more importantly, that he does not understand the basic structure of the language. I will ask as naphach did If structure of language is not known how can one assume to guess its meaning. ?

Yet, he continues with his philosophical meanderings. Lately he speaks often in philosophical terms of theophany. Where does this concept come from? Not surprisingly from ancient Greek thought.

Quote:
Encyclopdia Britannica Article
(from Greek theophaneia, appearance of God), manifestation of deity in sensible form. The term has been applied generally to the appearance of the gods in the ancient Greek and Near Eastern religions. The appearance of Zeus to Semele in his full godhead, "all his glory"

Um 'godhead' that sounds kind of xian.

Another pagan concept embraced by xians to explain what they admit is unexplainable.
DR