It seems as if you have no reply (as no other xtian can explain either) what in the world "sabachthani" means in ANY language. Hey, it's your bible, not mine. But you guys are the one claiming it references Psalm 22.

As for "others" on my list, I would direct you to my post of 12/31/07 at 2:24pm. In fact you did try to "defend" the Zechariah error in Matthew 23:35 previously.

What I find quite amusing is your quote:
"Every word spoken/written by the disciples and gospel writers is their personal opinion and is 50:50. Matt.23:2-10. Therefore the disciples' exegesis are FALLIBLE just as every sage, scholars, countermissionaries e.t.c are."


Do you see the difference? You are saying your bible is 50:50.
Our bible is written by G-d and His word through the prophets.
So yes, maybe a sage or scholars writings may be fallible, BUT our bible is not. You are admitting that parts of YOUR bible are!

Thanks!

Folah78
When you chop up my post and quote selectively like that it looks quite amusing -I am laughing too !

Here's the part you ignored: I know (not believe) Jesus is God. Therefore every word Jesus spoke has it's genesis/basis in the tanach and are INFALLIBLE when compared with the tanach source.