I hear ya.
Most people do not get past their childish understanding of certain verses or stories because that was the first time they heard the story and never re-examined it. They just keep repeating their 2nd, 4th, 8th grade understanding. Whatever it is.

As I said above, the story of creation and Adam and Chava is a very difficult part of the Torah. "Most" don't know what happened but 99.9999999% have no grasp of who Adam and Chava were and, heaven help us, they see Adam and Chava no differently than they see the cast of characters on a TV soap opera.

Chava had no "badness' prior to the sin and certainly never considered G-d as being wrong.

The same idea- the idea- can be applied to the Torah giants whom have become our Sages.
Rashi is not an Adam or a Chava but we are not a Rashi either. Not even a fingernail of Rashi's.

Was he human? Did he make mistakes? Of course!
Do we get to decide what they were?
Not a chance.
A Rambam can disagree with Rashi. And if a particular Rambam sits well with you while a particular Rashi leaves you confused, than by all means, enjoy with the Rambam. Think like the Rambam. But you have no place thinking Rashi was wrong.

There is a remarkable story about an uneducated journalist who went to see the Vilna Gaon, I think it was.
[Must have been about 10-12 years ago, I was in Israel and the Yated or Hamodia re-printed this journalist's story.]

This journalist, a maskil [an "enlightened" Jew. Meaning improperly uneducated.], he asked the Vilna Gaon something like 125 questions. All at once.
The Vilna Gaon told him he was really only asking, like, 12 questions. [I don't remember the actual numbers.] The Vilna Gaon told him, "Your question number 1,16,45,47, 66, 77,78.... are all the same question." And that's how the conversation went. If you want to call it a conversation.
Anyway, it came down to the very last point and this ignoramus of a journalist, who still didn't get it yet, he tried arguing back with the Vilna Gaon on this last point.
The Vilna Gaon told him he was clearly wrong because a Rashi says exactly the opposite of what he was trying to assert.
So the journalist said, "Maybe Rashi was wrong."
With that, the conversation ended and the Vila Gaon closed the door on the man.
The man, the journalist, goes on to say [because he wrote about this encounter in the paper he wrote for] that within the hour 2 huge men showed uop at his door and dragged him in front of the Beis Din.
The Beis Din asked him if he maligned Rashi. He said yes.
They chained him in stocks in front of the local synagogue and put a sign over him saying "This man maligns the Sages of Israel" and everyone who came to pray spit on him.
And as the journalist writes, "in Lodz-" or wherever this took place- "EVERYONE came to pray."

He writes in conclusion that he would go through it ALL OVER AGAIN just to experience that few-minutes meeting with the Vilna Gaon and re-experience his greatness.

This story applies here on a number of levels.

Lets include this conclusion as well.
If this completely wayward man was willing to relive a most disgusting humiliation just to come in contact with a Torah Sage of HIS OWN generation... could he or we, possibly imagine meeting a Torah Sage from 5 generations ago?
10 generations ago?
Talmudic Sages?
Kings David or Solomon?
The Prophets?
Moses?
Abraham, Isaac or Jacob???

So yes, as far as you are concerned, Rashi IS always right! And with G-d's help, you will keep learning and come to understand him, his Torah and his greatness.

Please donate to the following ENDANGERED SPECIES!
Preciousness of life.
Family structure.
Family values. 

Disarm a liberal. Vote for values.

Opinions of this signature are those of G-d's and any of His affiliates.