Yuku free message boards
Username or E-mail:
Password:
Forgot
Password?
Sign Up
Grab the Yuku app
Search:
RSS
Email
Virtual Yeshiva Discussion Forums
>
Counter-Missionary Forum
>
missionary folly on Daniel 9 (Answering Dr. Michael Brown)
0 Points
Search this Topic:
«Prev
1
2
3
4
5
6
Next»
Jump
Add Reply
Forum Jump
Counter-Missionary Forum
Counter-Missionary Education
Hebrew Language Education
Noahide Forum - בני נח
Ask The Rabbi
Knowing Your Orchard
Weekly Parsha Discussion
General Judaism Forum
Responding to Islam Forum
<< Previous Topic
Next Topic >>
Re: missionary folly on Daniel 9 (Answering Dr. Michael Brown)
Author
Comment
Douggg
#1
[-]
Posts
: 3232
Thu, 3-Sep-15 14:38:15
Reply
Quote
More
My Recent Posts
Hi Uri, the masorectic markings are fairly recent aren't they?
What is the purpose of the 62 weeks in your view?
Would God thought it so important to send Gabriel to foretell of some messiah figure in verse 26 who proved out to be a total unknown, as in Judaism interpretation? After all, for example, the horn on the goat as being foretold to be the king of Greece, in retrospect turned out to be Alexander the Great. And the little horn in Judaism's view, Antiochus IV. Both well known historical figures.
But in Daniel 9:26 - not a king at all, but some high priest, who is a total unknown to history. That doesn't make sense to me.
And what difference did it impart anything that high priest died?
My Lord, what a morning, when the stars begin to fall - Judith Durham
<< Previous Topic
Next Topic >>
Add Reply
Forum Jump
Counter-Missionary Forum
Counter-Missionary Education
Hebrew Language Education
Noahide Forum - בני נח
Ask The Rabbi
Knowing Your Orchard
Weekly Parsha Discussion
General Judaism Forum
Responding to Islam Forum
Share This
Email to Friend
del.icio.us
Digg it
Facebook
Blogger
Yahoo MyWeb
«Prev
1
2
3
4
5
6
Next»
Jump
Virtual Yeshiva Discussion Forums
>
Counter-Missionary Forum
>
missionary folly on Daniel 9 (Answering Dr. Michael Brown)
Click to subscribe by RSS
Click to receive E-mail notifications of replies