Quote:
Not the same. You restated but misrepresented. It was not a belief but an experience in their particular case. They did not hear about Jesus, nor read about Jesus - he was right there with them after having risen from the grave. And it was not merely a majority, but 100%.


Wow! A double fallacy! A dose of Ad Hominem Tu Quoque followed by Hasty Generalization.


Actually, to have Hasty Generalization the person using it would have to observe the group that is being used in the sample. In this case, how can the group be observed?
As Sophiee, stated how do we know that what is recorded is fiction or real experiences?

Shalom,
Gretta