Douggg,
Well it looks like Thomas came to your rescue. I hope you read my reply, which was:
To me, the difference I see is this; MT specifically uses Hebrew biblical quotes and verses to substantiate it's claims whereas most of your backup is based on "possible solutions" or "suggested resolutions". Now I'm not trying to be mean and I do respect your opinion, but I just wanted to show you the contrast.

It is all possibilities and suggestions. Your comment referenced something about "100%". How can I believe 100% in possibilities and suggestions? To me 100% would be concrete evidence, don't you agree?