Rabbi,
If sin can be atoned without animal sacrifice, why would anyone go back to sacrificing animals?
| Author | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
tyolilums |
Animal Sacrifice |
Lead | |
|
Rabbi,
|
|||
Rabbi Daniel |
|||
|
Good question.
Simply put, because we lost the ideal. We are presently operating with a downgraded system. We want to go back to the ideal.
The Torah calls Yishmael 'pereh adam.' Not a man who appears wild but wild who appears a man.
|
|||
Sophiee1 |
|||
|
The question remains: "why is sacrifice the ideal?" The answer is: what of YOURSELF are you giving of value to the Creator of all things?
It is easy enough to say "gee, I'm sorry" and then keep on doing the same horrible things one did before. Ever meet a teen ager? "SORR-RRY!" and it doesn't mean a thing! This is the moral behind the story of Cain and Abel. Abel brought his best. Cain did the least he could. Which did G-d desire more? So why sacrificing animals? It isn't about the animals. It is about doing the most you can do with the best that you have. And very few of us really do that, do we? We don't do it for the ones we are supposed to love (our wives, our husbands, our children), let alone for the one who loves us most of all -- HaShem. Sacrifice isn't for G-d. G-d needs nothing. Sacrifice is for us -- to give and by giving, gain. If we do not do the best we can we are worthless. We are nothing. And THIS is not "going back to sacrificing" this is going FORTH to sacrificing. It isn't giving away or killing senselessly. It is giving the best part of ourselves, to gain the part we never even knew we had. Kapich?
סופי
And everything that Sarah tells you, listen to her voice. Bereshit (Genesis) 21:12
|
|||
UriYosef |
|||
tyolilums wrote:I agree with Rabbi Daniel's "philosophical" answer. What I would like to add is that our prophets foretold in the T'nach that we will be getting back to "the deal", i.e., that the sacrificial system will be reinstated in the Third Temple - the one that the Jewish Messiah will build. Read the last nine chapters in the Book of Ezekiel, where you will find a detailed description of the Third Temple, the rituals that will be carried out (including the sacrificial sin and other offering, and those who will serve in it. UriYosef
Our raison d'être:
WHOSOEVER DESTROYS A SINGLE SOUL OF ISRAEL, SCRIPTURE IMPUTES [GUILT] TO HIM AS THOUGH HE HAD DESTROYED A COMPLETE WORLD; AND WHOSOEVER PRESERVES A SINGLE SOUL OF ISRAEL, SCRIPTURE ASCRIBES [MERIT] TO HIM AS THOUGH HE HAD PRESERVED A COMPLETE WORLD. (Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin, 37a) The fruits of our effort: The battle against spiritual terrorism is being won, one soul at a time!!! |
|||
Rabbi Daniel |
|||
|
The question remains: "why is sacrifice the ideal?"
No, that's a new question.
The Torah calls Yishmael 'pereh adam.' Not a man who appears wild but wild who appears a man.
|
|||
nightghost |
Watching the sacrifice | ||
|
When giving a sacrifice did the person giving it have to watch the sacrifice?
|
|||
Rabbi Daniel |
|||
|
A sacrifice wasn't a payment that was mailed in.
It was a cathartic experience. The person was present and his mind had to focused on what was taking place and why. The wrong thoughts during the sacrificial process would have nullified the sacrifice. And depending on the offering, from some of them the priests and the owner received different portions of meat which they used as a meal. And it was a holy, sacred meal. They both had to eat their portions, again with intentional, concentrated thought. Because what else separates man from the animals but our capacity to think and the intimated responsibilities which come with it. The Temple Mount was no place for frivolousness nor even lack of attention. The person bringing the sacrifice was present and with presence of mind.
The Torah calls Yishmael 'pereh adam.' Not a man who appears wild but wild who appears a man.
|
|||
Sophiee1 |
|||
Rabbi Daniel wrote:But wasn't it poetic?
סופי
And everything that Sarah tells you, listen to her voice. Bereshit (Genesis) 21:12
|
|||
tyolilums |
|||
|
I'll go back and read Ezekiel. But I'm not really questioning the fact prophets foretold another temple and reinstating the sacrificial system. I suppose that's reasoning enough. However, what about the verses in Isaiah and Hosea which, I think, basically say God never really wanted animal sacrifice? How do they factor in? I can understand the desire to give your best. But anytime you give something apart from yourself...it's easy to begin to abuse that system. How is a poor cow the best you have? Especially in a society where there are very few herders/farmers or where people don't put a lot of importance on animals per se. Purchasing a cow to give over for sin sacrifice may have very little meaning to most, unless you are an animal lover like me then you might have some serious incentive to avoid that. Lets say a third temple is rebuilt. Is it conceivable that the establishment of sin sacrifice could be exchanged for another idea, such as making the person
indebted to doing public work for a certain amount of time or carrying out another type of offering? I base this idea on the fact some things like 'eye for
an eye' aren't taken literally but are carried out in a more practical way. (btw, I hope I'm not making this insulting because I really don't
intend it to be)
|
|||
Rabbi Daniel |
|||
|
"What about the verses in Isaiah and Hosea which, I think, basically say God never really wanted animal sacrifice? How do they factor in?"
Isaiah scolded Israel with those words because we ended up treating the sacrifices like mail-order atonement. [Maintaining my previous analogy.] "Oh, I sinned. Says here 'offer a cow.' OK. G-d, here's your cow." Isaiah was saying, "No, G-d doesn't want your cows. He wants YOU/US." Offerings should be a cathartic experience for US! We should shudder appreciating it should be US on the alter! What happened to our relationship with G-d? Our gratitude for His providing? Our connection we once sought with Him? Cows aren't rich or poor. When you are going to bring a gift to G-d, to the Boss- if that will help you understand it better- the Boss knows how much he pays you. A person with good sense and gratitude knows the Boss be moved by a gift of quality and that is well thought out even if it's inexpensive, rather than throwing at him whatever the sales clerk picks out because you can't be bothered. When Kain brought his offering it says from the field. Nothing special. When Abel brought his offering it was from the choicest. Abel's offer was accepted. Not because G-d wanted a sheep. It was because Abel showed he valued the relationship. We're introduced with a sacrifice being a male from the cattle. An unblemished animal. If that was too much you could bring a sheep. But still one fit for offering. If that was still too much a bird was acceptable. For the poorest of the poor there were flour offerings. So unlike the analogy, we couldn't pick out any gift we wanted. There were parameters. [Which also points to US learning something from the sacrifice. Not us picking it out as if to teach G-d something.] Being that G-d knows what's in every man's heart, he wasn't looking for the animal. He was looking for the heart. We might not have coined the phrase, "There but for the grace of G-d go I" but we certainly put in motion the concept. This all being the case, now you can probably appreciate that sacrifices were exceptionally practical and on many levels. Animal sacrifices kept 10's of thousands of Jews fed. Priests were not land owners and their sustenance and livelihood came from temple sacrifices and gifts. Animal sacrifices kept wealthy people in check. When you bring the best you can afford to G-d out of gratitude that it all came from Him then it is harder to turn away the poor who ask you to share a bit of the wealth with them as well. Animal sacrifices kept powerful/arrogant people in check. You can't watch the life drain from an animal, knowing that should be you, and then turn around and abuse another person. Animal sacrifices kept unhealthy, self-deprecating in check. As low as someone might have sunk, they knew they they were not an animal. They still had some vestige of having been created in G-d's image. Of still being part of the big picture. Maybe they felt at 2% capacity. Maybe they thought G-d hated them. But while sacrifices were going on, no Jew could ever be so empty as to think himself no better than an animal. Animal sacrifices kept the world in check. The Temple was available to all the nations of the world. Anyone was welcome to bring a sacrifice to G-d and any person was able to draw from the richness of depth and breadth of the sacrifices whatever they were willing to draw. Animal sacrifices kept the world at peace. And every Sukkos holiday 70 sacrifices were offered on behalf of the continuity and well being of the 70 nations of the world. Until that time when Israel allowed their evil inclinations to overpower themselves, thereby reducing the once invaluable House of G-d into a glorified, yet valueless, meat processing plant. But G-d doesn't need a butcher. So there arose a leader of a nation who similarly saw no value in it and came and destroyed it. He destroyed a shell of a building because Israel had already destroyed the content. Prayer has been the new service of the heart. May G-d have mercy on us and redeem us and may His house be rebuilt, speedily and in our day!
The Torah calls Yishmael 'pereh adam.' Not a man who appears wild but wild who appears a man.
Last Edited By: Rabbi Daniel
03/26/09 12:17:34.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
brgordon |
Sacrifice or Murder? | ||
|
Doesn't Sacrifice imply giving up something? If you are giving something that is not yours to begin with where is your Sacrifice? The Christians believe in
human Sacrifice. But that would be murder so they claim their human was God. So God committed suicide. It makes no sense. In Genesis God gives man every herb
of the field for meat. But selfish meat eaters don't like that so they claim the Bible gives rules for eating meat as does the Torah apparently. But the
Bible gives rules for slavery as well does that mean God condones slavery? For the entire history of slavery Christians would say yes. Now that it is illegal
and considered immoral by every right thinking person well that book is no longer a moral code.
Animals have their own lives and souls and are not ours to give. When animals kill each other they do not know any better. They are hungry so they do what is their instinct. Their souls allow them to suffer fear and pain but not to reason morally. It is bad enough that human beings still eat animals when we no longer live in a world devoid of other food during the winter must we advocate Sacrifice as well? Religions obsession with blood and how much God desires it sickens me. Is God some kind of vampire? I don't think so. But man will rationalize eating animals and killing them for sport to even to pay debts to God. This is why many science minded people see religion as primitive thinking. When will religion learn to catch up to modern philosophy? Of course most scientist are meat eaters too whether they are religious or not but atleast they have given up the primitive concept of human or animal Sacrifice. |
|||
Rabbi Daniel |
|||
|
"Doesn't Sacrifice imply giving up something? If you are giving something that is not yours to begin with
where is your Sacrifice?"
That is true. A sacrifice had to belong to the person who was bringing it. If you read the Torah you'll see birds were allowed instead of cattle to accommodate the poor. [We'll cut out the xtian stuff for relevance and brevity sake. ] "In Genesis God gives man every herb of the field for meat. But selfish meat eaters don't like that so they claim the Bible gives rules for eating meat as does the Torah apparently." Very apparently. See Gen. 9:3 for starters. Where G-d tells mankind they can eat meat. Did you ever read it? "the Bible gives rules for slavery as well does that mean God condones slavery?" Do you really need me to answer that? "Animals have their own lives and souls and are not ours to give. When animals kill each other they do not know any better. They are hungry so they do what is their instinct. Their souls allow them to suffer fear and pain but not to reason morally." I never knew such tests were run on animal souls. Where did you get your data from? Can animals reason immorally? That would explain justifying their eating each other. Maybe its not instinct but reasoning immorally. Like liberal democrats who advocate second and third term abortions and gay marriages. "It is bad enough that human beings still eat animals when we no longer live in a world devoid of other food during the winter must we advocate Sacrifice as well?" Two things. If global warming is due to cow flatulence, so wouldn't eating a cow be a good thing? Second, as you intimated above, but not in so many words, [because not only do you NOT read that which you complain about but you also do NOT read your own words,] G-d advocates meat eating, slavery [according to Jewish law], and sacrifices. We do what G-d wants. "Religions obsession with blood and how much God desires it sickens me. Is God some kind of vampire?" The problem really isn't with G-d. It's your ignorant blabbering. First of all, read the Torah if you want to complain about it. Because you clearly haven't. Second of all, think about it. You know, like a "science minded" person would. I'll give you a head start: We haven't had a temple for over 1900 years. Do you know when the last time we had an animal sacrifice was? I know you don't. Over 1900 hundred years ago! What kind of an obsession is it when you ABSTAIN from sacrifice for over 1900 years? What kind of an obsession is it when you advocate prayer in place of sacrifice? What kind of an obsession is it when you obligate only TWO community sacrifices... and the rest were required ONLY IF someone sinned? What kind of an obsession is it when tens of thousands of people who had no fields were fed off of the meat and breads from sacrifices? "I don't think so." ...so maybe it's time you started. "This is why many science minded people see religion as primitive thinking." But since we all know that science only acknowledges what it can see, touch and measure... and since religious minded people think BEYOND that BOX- to what cannot be measured... to what is beyond measurement... so the reality is that the scientists are the primitive thinking ones. Like when you have an infant and hold a rattle infront of him, and he wants it. Then you take the rattle away and as soon as it is out of site, its forgotten. The infant has lost all interest because the rattle has left its sphere of reality. That's the scientific mind. Only what it can grasp within its sphere of reality. Primitive and infantile. "When will religion learn to catch up to modern philosophy?" Soon as it throws the gear in reverse. "Of course most scientist are meat eaters too whether they are religious or not but atleast they have given up the primitive concept of human or animal Sacrifice." Flaming hypocrisy aside, they actually make the biggest human sacrifice of all. They cut themselves off from the purpose of humanity. The academic said, "Why don't you put him in an institution, have a life of your own?" The Jewish mother responded, "What meaning would my life have?"
Last Edited By: Rabbi Daniel
05/15/09 01:55:15.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
Pamela 1965 |
|||
|
Wouldn't money be a better sacrifice or the thing that caused you to sin in the first place? Like for example lets say someone has problems with porn.
Wanted it be better to throw out the Rated R movies, throw away the porn books then to sacrifice the family pet? I love animals and this would be a hard thing
for me to see an aniamal die. I go to the store and buy my meat but if I had to kill a chicken, cow ect I would have to go veggy.
|
|||
Rabbi Daniel |
|||
|
We are such a soft, pampered, hyper-sensitive-to-grossness generation that, yes, the thought of having to kill a cow or chicken would even give me pause.
Unlike the olden days when everyone had their own animals or went to town and picked out an animal to be slaughtered or one that already was on display on a
hook.
Back then, if a woman couldn't gut a calf, well, what kind of a woman was she!? There are still a few places in town where you can pick out your own live lobsters. I saw a clip of a Japanese restaurant that prided themselves on how fresh their food was. The lobster was still moving on the far end of the plate while you were feasting off its innards on the front end. Transgression of "limb of a live animal" aside, it was mighty gross! If you happen to have a cow that is the family pet, you certainly do not have to dedicate IT as the gift offering to G-d. And as far as the money issue, do you think cows grow on trees? It might be easier for some people to relate to them properly if they did but until they do, a cow is good money and giving it or giving cash is, essentially, one in the same. I did speak to a cow once. He told me about his 401K savings and his retirement portfolio. He had planned on doing some traveling in his older years. He heard the grass in Brazil was much greener than the grass in Texas. He showed me some pictures of his grand children and he mooed with such nachas. I went back to see him again, but, alas, he ended up as dinner for a number of families who are raising children and grandchildren of their own. What a waste. Another remorseful story of a bovine's shattered dreams. Damn you people! Damn you!
Please donate to the following ENDANGERED SPECIES!
Preciousness of life.
Family structure.
Family values.
G-dly values.
Disarm a liberal. Vote for values.
|
|||
Pamela 1965 |
|||
We are such a soft, pampered, hyper-sensitive-to-grossness generation that, yes, the thought of having to kill a cow or chicken would even give me pause.Yes we are spoiled. We just go to the store and buy our food and never give a thought of how that turkey was killed, or how that cow was killed. Unlike the olden days when everyone had their own animals or went to town and picked out an animal to be slaughtered or one that already was on display on a hook.I am sure Laurel Ingalls Wilder watch her dad slaughter the animals on her farm. That was just the way of life back then. There are still a few places in town where you can pick out your own live lobsters. I saw a clip of a Japanese restaurant that prided themselves on how fresh their food was. The lobster was still moving on the far end of the plate while you were feasting off its innards on the front end. Yes I have heard that Lobsters scream when you cook them. This would bother me to hear them scream, if I were cooking them.
Oh really? I saw an advertism on Tv. This guy wanted milk for his cereal and heard a moo out side in the field. So he goes out side, and throws his cereal bowl under the belly of the cow then he began to hunt around for the cow's adders and couldn't find them. A couple that were looking out their window was watching him and the wife says to the husband. "Shouldn't we tell him that this isn't a cow but a bull?" The husband says,"No he'll figure it out for himself." Poor guy didn't get cream in his cereal bowl that day. |
|||
Rabbi Daniel |
|||
Pamela 1965 wrote:
Please donate to the following ENDANGERED SPECIES!
Preciousness of life.
Family structure.
Family values.
G-dly values.
Disarm a liberal. Vote for values.
|
|||
brgordon |
|||
|
"Doesn't Sacrifice imply giving up something? If you are giving something that is not yours to begin with
where is your Sacrifice?"
That is true. A sacrifice had to belong to the person who was bringing it. If you read the Torah you'll see birds were allowed instead of cattle to accommodate the poor. [We'll cut out the xtian stuff for relevance and brevity sake. ] Man can no more own an animal then he can own another man. "In Genesis God gives man every herb of the field for meat. But selfish meat eaters don't like that so they claim the Bible gives rules for eating meat as does the Torah apparently." Very apparently. See Gen. 9:3 for starters. Where G-d tells mankind they can eat meat. Did you ever read it? Yes I read Genesis but 9:3 is after the FALL after man is kicked out of paradise. Did you even read Gen 1:29? And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat. "the Bible gives rules for slavery as well does that mean God condones slavery?" Do you really need me to answer that? Yes I do. Man often fits his rules into holy books. Man wanted slaves so man put rules in holy books for how to treat slaves claiming it is God's word. "Animals have their own lives and souls and are not ours to give. When animals kill each other they do not know any better. They are hungry so they do what is their instinct. Their souls allow them to suffer fear and pain but not to reason morally." I never knew such tests were run on animal souls. Where did you get your data from? Can animals reason immorally? That would explain justifying their eating each other. Maybe its not instinct but reasoning immorally. Like liberal democrats who advocate second and third term abortions and gay marriages. I never knew such test was run on human's souls. Where did your get your data from? You seem pretty scientific here for a person bashing science. Animals can suffer both physical pain as well as emotional pain. There are obviously aware and self conscious. The only thing missing is immortality and human beings can not prove that in themselves either.If you can accept that aspect for one type of being that is self aware capable of pain and awareness then you can by the same faith accept that for the other. "It is bad enough that human beings still eat animals when we no longer live in a world devoid of other food during the winter must we advocate Sacrifice as well?" Two things. If global warming is due to cow flatulence, so wouldn't eating a cow be a good thing? That is like arguing that genocide is a good thing because of all the damage human beings have done the the environment.Besides all animals have flatulence including human beings. Second, as you intimated above, but not in so many words, [because not only do you NOT read that which you complain about but you also do NOT read your own words,] G-d advocates meat eating, slavery [according to Jewish law], and sacrifices. We do what G-d wants. Are you admitting religious holy books advocate slavery? I will tell you what I tell xtians. Holy books are just that books not God himself. They are books written by man. God can get through the text in places but man is obstinate and will not only interpret words for his own benefit but will edit out what he doesn't like. "Religions obsession with blood and how much God desires it sickens me. Is God some kind of vampire?" The problem really isn't with G-d. It's your ignorant blabbering. There is no ignorance. I speak the truth. The xtian myth is built upon the Jewish myth. Jesus is all about bloodshed and the holy books go on and on about sacrifice. We don't have sacrifice much anymore not because of the morals of religion but inspite of them. It was only from unorthodox freethinkers that questioned the church that came the ideas of slavery as immoral and sacrifice as unecessary. Why wasn't the first page of any holy book dedicated to equality of women or the immorality of slavery or the soul of animals and compassion for all living including animals? Because most holy books were inspired by mans desire to keep on doing what ever pleased him not what pleased God. First of all, read the Torah if you want to complain about it. Because you clearly haven't. Second of all, think about it. Ok I will read the Torah. I read everything else.And I will come back and formally apologize here if the Torah contradicts what I have learned about religion by studying all the other holy books. If the Torah admits the truth of reincarnation that was originally accepted by all religions at one time or another and if the Torah admits that animals have souls and do not deserve to be slaughtered for food sport or sacrifice..if also the Torah doesnt present God as a Jealous and Angry God that kills with floods or dashes babies heads against the stones like the bible it inspires. If the Torah is totally different and presents a God of love and peace instead of war and punishment. Then and only then will I apologize. You know, like a "science minded" person would. I'll give you a head start: We haven't had a temple for over 1900 years. Do you know when the last time we had an animal sacrifice was? I know you don't. Over 1900 hundred years ago! What kind of an obsession is it when you ABSTAIN from sacrifice for over 1900 years? I was refering to meat eaters obession with justifying killing animals and denying animals souls as well as human beiings need to create religion based on human sacrifice or killing like Christianity. What kind of an obsession is it when you advocate prayer in place of sacrifice? What kind of an obsession is it when you obligate only TWO community sacrifices... and the rest were required ONLY IF someone sinned? Shouldnt be required at all. Murder is never pleasing to God. Thal shall not kill What kind of an obsession is it when tens of thousands of people who had no fields were fed off of the meat and breads from sacrifices? I know in history the was times when meat was the only food way way back. But one that doesnt justify sacrifice (Killing To Appease God) and two it has been along time since man has been starving without meat. Or dependent on it. "I don't think so." ...so maybe it's time you started. Obviously I think a lot. Just because I disagree with you doesnt mean I do not think. How arrogant. "This is why many science minded people see religion as primitive thinking." But since we all know that science only acknowledges what it can see, touch and measure... and since religious minded people think BEYOND that BOX- to what cannot be measured... to what is beyond measurement... so the reality is that the scientists are the primitive thinking ones. Which is why we have philosophy which you mock and without there would be no theology. Also no religious bigots who neither respect science or philosophy.Also science doesn't need to "see" things to measure them. Quantum Physics easily surpasses religion in approaching the truth of the Mystics that by the way religion has almost always persecuted. We need science and philosophy together. Religion by itself hardly makes a contribution unless you include religious philosophers. Like when you have an infant and hold a rattle infront of him, and he wants it. Then you take the rattle away and as soon as it is out of site, its forgotten. The infant has lost all interest because the rattle has left its sphere of reality. That's the scientific mind. Only what it can grasp within its sphere of reality. Primitive and infantile. The analytical mind is neither primitive or infantile. The intellect is a gift from God. Basing science on empiricism does not limit it. That only focuses it. Scientist pay attention to reality that can be observed. Any other method of measuring truth is both infantile and primitive. Just like a baby religion needs to get what it wants and demands it and throws a fit when it doesnt get it. Religion wants a personal God that thinks and feels like a human and can guide us like a stern father that will punish and reward us. No matter how simplistic this makes God religion doesnt care as long as it produces sheep or followers. Science has to justifyu itself and constantly question its premises. Religion lives on dogma and keeping hysterical emotional responses going out of fear of the unknown. Rituals and Rules from thousands of years ago. Repetition and Consenus and Dogma. Without this primitive mind religion vanishes. Only Mystics Philosophers or Scientist have even a glimmer of truth on the nature of reality. And religion has only survived by sucking the blood out of those discplines and claiming the knowledge as thier own like a parasite. Before those discplines established themselves the worlds great religions only existed like any other of the small minded magic thinking cults before them accepting the Earth as flat and the center of the universe. Religion claims they know God personally yet historically thier ignorance was apalling. "When will religion learn to catch up to modern philosophy?" Soon as it throws the gear in reverse. In reverse? How can that be when they never left the starting gate? What was it 10 years ago the Pope admitted the truth of evolution? "Of course most scientist are meat eaters too whether they are religious or not but atleast they have given up the primitive concept of human or animal Sacrifice." Flaming hypocrisy aside, Scientist are meat eaters. Where is the hypocrisy? Human beings are meat eaters. Whether religious or atheist meat eaters rationalize everything. I was only implying that atleast science never killed animals for some God. Atleast it was for food. But then I think about experimentation and I have to agree wth you it's the same thing. they actually make the biggest human sacrifice of all. They cut themselves off from the purpose of humanity. Science and Philosophy IS the purpose of humanity. To seek wisdom and truth. Religion is and always will be just comfort food. I bet you take antibiotics and drive a car and use a microwave. Don't tell me you dont benefit from science. |
|||
brgordon |
An Apology Out of Respect | ||
|
By the way I know that this discussion has become a bit heated. I will not apologize for my passion. I believe God is LOVE. And I believe that so called Holy
Books such as the Bible Torah Koran are written by man about a god with human traits esp the negative passions of man such as Jealousy Anger and Vengeance. I
believe when God is spoken about this way it does not do justice to describe a God of LOVE a God who is LOVE. So being
passionate and only human myself I defend God against man's concepts of him/her. I apologize to you if my ego has become
zealous towards you. I do not mean to be self righteous. I believe religion has held mankind back and has often got in the way with a true relationship
with God by offering a "man inspired concept" of God based on man's base desires as a substitute for the real thing. So if you want to continue
this discussion I prefer to do so on a higher spiritual plane.
If not I just want to thank God for this forum and say I appreciate and respect those on this forum even if I do not appreciate or respect most teachings of religion. I respect your right to pursue spiritual truth through your chosen teachings. I can not help but challenge teachings that insult my understanding of God as LOVE. But this is how God made me. My nature is the catalyst as was Socrates, Jesus, Buddha. I am not comapring myself to them accept to say my nature is to question assumptions to make people think beyond blind faith in dogma or ideologies. But I came here to learn the difference between Judaism and Christians. And on a Christian message board I never would of got this far in open discussion. They would of just preached to me or got violent with me and would eventually just kick me off. I am attracted to the Jewish teachings because the Jewish religion I thought was much more tolerant to other religions or ways of thinking. I want to learn if Jews have any teachings on reincarnation and I want yo know what Jews say to Christians when they threaten them with Hell for not accepting Jesus. As a Buddhist I am constantly confronted by Christians for not accepting Jesus as an incarnation of God. When I found this site I found I have this in common with the Jewish faith and wanted to know how you handled it. That was my main reason for coming here. So again I apologize if I am out of line in anyway. It just hurts me that most human beings won't even consider the pain we cause animals or that they may have souls and suffer just like us. I am not saying that you should agree with anything let alone everything I say. Just that this is sincerly how I feel. In Revelations God says the lion will lay down with the lamb. This is not an allegory about peace among different nations. There will be no "nations". This about all life being infused 100% with Gods' soul of LOVE. This is my understanding according to my soul. And that is all I have. |
|||
UriYosef |
|||
|
brgordon,
I suggest that you be more respectful in your posts on our boards, especially when you address one of our Rabbis. brgordon wrote:Excuse me??? "the FALL"? This is a Christian term. Judaism doesn't recognize this mythical Charistian terminology invented specifically to rationalize the the basis of the Christian religion. Excuse me (yet again)??? Where did you find this translation of Genesis 1:29. There is no word for 'meat' in that verse in the original Hebrew text. The Hebrew word for meat is בָּשָׂר, baSAR, and the word that appears at the end of Genesis 1:29 is לְאָכְלָה, l'ochLAH, meaning 'for food'. The word אָכְלָה, ochLAH, is used in the Hebrew Bible synonymously with the more common Hebrew word אֹכֶל, Ochel, meaning 'food'. There are many other passages in the Torah that specifically discuss the consumption of meat. You need to read the Torah (in a decent translation) before you make general statements based on one mistranslated verse. UriYosef
Our raison d'être:
WHOSOEVER DESTROYS A SINGLE SOUL OF ISRAEL, SCRIPTURE IMPUTES [GUILT] TO HIM AS THOUGH HE HAD DESTROYED A COMPLETE WORLD; AND WHOSOEVER PRESERVES A SINGLE SOUL OF ISRAEL, SCRIPTURE ASCRIBES [MERIT] TO HIM AS THOUGH HE HAD PRESERVED A COMPLETE WORLD. (Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin, 37a) The fruits of our effort: The battle against spiritual terrorism is being won, one soul at a time!!!
Last Edited By: UriYosef
05/17/09 12:26:16.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
brgordon |
|||
|
Nice... I word an apology from my heart and post it and say I respect you but instead of posting it you use my words against me. Do you worship God by being
deceiving? By posting your own words and not posting mine you are deceiving people about my character. Does the Torah teach the Jews to be deceiving to win an
argument? I notice that you did this after finding out I am Buddhist and not Jewish. I do not expect you to post this since you didn't post my last
message. So this message is to you personally. If you think God approves of you lying to get your way then you are sadly mistaken.
|
|||
UriYosef |
|||
|
brgordon,
This is the "Ask the Rabbi" forum, and I don't know who released your previous post (the one of 05/17/09 02:15:25) - I assume it was one of our Rabbis who did so. I responded to a couple inaccurate statements you made in it. The fact that you follow Buddhism is immaterial to my response. I addressed two errors in the passage that I quoted from your post. Having clarified this, I suggest that you read the rules posted at the top of the forum, and I now issue you a final warning about the offensive language you have been using here. You've made only 4 posts since you joined our community, one of which is not yet released since it is on our "Ask the Rabbi" forum, and it is their decision. These are Jewish discussion boards and I'm sure that Buddhism teaches its followers certain rules of conduct when they are guests in someone else's home. So, unless you stop calling us liars and use other offensive terminology, you will not have the privilege of participating in our discussions. UriYosef
Our raison d'être:
WHOSOEVER DESTROYS A SINGLE SOUL OF ISRAEL, SCRIPTURE IMPUTES [GUILT] TO HIM AS THOUGH HE HAD DESTROYED A COMPLETE WORLD; AND WHOSOEVER PRESERVES A SINGLE SOUL OF ISRAEL, SCRIPTURE ASCRIBES [MERIT] TO HIM AS THOUGH HE HAD PRESERVED A COMPLETE WORLD. (Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin, 37a) The fruits of our effort: The battle against spiritual terrorism is being won, one soul at a time!!!
Last Edited By: UriYosef
05/17/09 16:55:43.
Edited 2 times.
|
|||
